Talk:Phil's Relto

From MYSTlore

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is written as if it were canon. I doubt that, so it should at least get the "unverified-canon-section" template… but I think the text needs some major rewording regardless. Chucker 14:28, 15 August 2007 (CDT)

How's it look now. I fleshed out the text a little, and removed the speculation about Phil's Relto Pages, and the "stub" template... it doesn't seem like there's much more to say. Also, I'm not sure what "written as if it were canon" means, so I didn't use the "unverified-canon-section" template. --DedHed 09:49, 18 September 2007 (CDT)

Yup, much better now. Chucker 09:52, 18 September 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "http://en.mystlore.com/wiki/Talk:Phil%27s_Relto"
Personal tools